97在线观看视频,很黄很色120秒试看,久久久久久久综合日本,1000部精品久久久久久久久,欧美freesex10一13

育路教育網(wǎng),權(quán)威招生服務(wù)平臺(tái)
新東方在線

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(30)

來(lái)源:中華考試網(wǎng) 時(shí)間:2011-12-30 14:23:47

 What to do with the jerk at work, the person who is so disliked by their colleagues that no one wants to work with them? The traditional answer is to tolerate them if they are at least half competent—on the grounds that competent jerks can be trained to be otherwise, while much loved bunglers cannot.

  A recent study suggests that such an approach seriously underestimates the value of being liked. In a study of over 10,000 work relationships at five very different organisations, Tiziana Casciaro and Miguel Sousa Lobo, academics at Harvard Business School and the Fuqua School of Business respectively, found that (given the choice) people consistently and overwhelmingly prefer to work with a “lovable fool” than with a competent jerk.

  The authors suggest that as well as training jerks to be more charming—although “sadly there are people who are disliked because they are socially incompetent, and probably never will be truly charming”—companies should also “leverage the likeable”. Amiable folk should be turned into “affective hubs”, people who can bridge gaps “between diverse groups that might not otherwise interact”.

  Re-evaluating jolly types who spend long hours hanging round water coolers is currently fashionable. Ronald Burt, a sociologist at the University of Chicago and a leading proponent of “social capital”—an explanation of “how people do better because they are somehow better connected with other people”—has written a book (“Brokerage and Closure”) in which he describes the “clusters” and “bridges” that are typical of organisations’ informal networks. Mr Burt calls the people who form bridges between clusters “brokers”; they resemble Ms Casciaro’s and Mr Sousa Lobo’s affective hubs. In practice, Mr Burt has found that brokers do better than people without the social skills to cross the spaces between clusters.

  A book published in English this week, but already a cause célèbre in France, portrays most employees as fools—lovable or otherwise. Corinne Maier’s “Bonjour Laziness” is a worm’s eye view of a corporate world where only three creatures exist: sheep (“weak and inoffensive”); pests (“poisoning the general atmosphere”); and loafers (“their only aim is to do as little as possible”). In the view of Ms Maier, a practising psychoanalyst, pests (ie, jerks) rule the corporate world. (So does being a jerk give you the skills needed to get to the top? And only in France?) The rest can only hope to lie low and await their pension. But, assuming you are lovable, far better, surely, to follow the Burt route: head straight for the water cooler.

 1. According to paragraph 1, what has been the traditional attitude to jerks at work?

 。跘] Fire them, even if they are good workers.

  [B] Fire them, because they are not good workers.

 。跜] Accept them, if they are good workers.

 。跠] Accept them, because they are good workers.

  2. According to the study mentioned in paragraph 2, why is this incorrect?

 。跘] Being liked is more important than being competent.

  [B] Being liked and incompetent is worse than being disliked and competent.

 。跜] Being disliked and competent is worse than being liked and incompetent.

  [D] Being liked and incompetent is better than being disliked and competent.

  3. What could incompetent jerks be used for in companies?

 。跘] To enhance communication between different workgroups.

 。跙] For training people to be nice.

 。跜] For making companies appear charming.

 。跠] To charm people who are not particularly liked.

  4. Which of the following is the best definition of “social capital”?

 。跘] The ability to use people to your advantage.

 。跙] The ability to form social networks.

 。跜] The ability to do well in life because you have connections.

  [D] The ability to make business connections.

  5. According to the final paragraph, lovable jerks can be considered to be

 。跘] sheep.

  [B] pests.

 。跜] loafers.

 。跠] none of the above.

  參考答案:

  1-5 CDACD

    考試須知:2012考研時(shí)間安排 應(yīng)試技巧及考場(chǎng)須知 ♦首發(fā)2012考研真題

    考前必看:準(zhǔn)考證下載入口 ♦2012年考研考場(chǎng)規(guī)則2012考研考場(chǎng)查詢

    復(fù)習(xí)備考:政治時(shí)事匯總 必背考點(diǎn) 預(yù)測(cè)試題 ♦ 英語(yǔ)作文預(yù)測(cè) 模板大全

結(jié)束

特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來(lái)源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來(lái)源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;

②部分稿件來(lái)源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請(qǐng)聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。

有用

25人覺(jué)得有用

閱讀全文

2019考研VIP資料免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取

【隱私保障】

育路為您提供專業(yè)解答

相關(guān)文章推薦

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(29)

 Being the founder of the Internet’s largest encyclopedia means Jimmy Wales gets a lot o......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(27)

  Each year, 1,400 high-school students from more than 40 countries are invited to compete in......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(26)

  “3M” comes from “Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing,” but those three......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(25)

 “How do I get into journalism?” is a question that almost anyone who works in thi......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(24)

The Indian finance ministry's mid-year review, released this week, sees the external sect......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀高分版(23)

 WHAT do you do when everyone hates you? That is the problem faced by America's pharmaceutica......

您可能感興趣
為什么要報(bào)考研輔導(dǎo)班? 如何選擇考研輔導(dǎo)班? 考研輔導(dǎo)班哪個(gè)好? 哪些北京考研輔導(dǎo)班靠譜? 2019考研輔導(dǎo)班大全