1、It applies equally to traditional historians who view history as only the external and internal criticism of sources, and to social science historians, who equate their activity with specific techniques !
譯文:它同樣適用于傳統(tǒng)歷史學(xué)家和社會(huì)科學(xué)歷史學(xué)家,傳統(tǒng)歷史學(xué)家(或前者)將歷史僅僅看作是對(duì)歷史材料來源的內(nèi)部的和外部的批評(píng),社會(huì)科學(xué)歷史學(xué)家(或后者)把歷史 研究活動(dòng)等同于具體的研究方法。
2、For example , they do not compensate for gross social inequality , and thus do not tell how able an underprivileged youngster might have been had he grown up under more favorable circumstances.
譯文:例如,它們不能彌補(bǔ)巨大的社會(huì)不公,因此不能說明一個(gè)物質(zhì)條件差的年輕人會(huì)有多大才干,如果他在較好的環(huán)境中長(zhǎng)大。
3、There is no agreement whether methodology refers to the concepts peculiar to historical work in general or to the research techniques appropriate to the various branches of historical inquiry .
譯文:方法論是指一般的歷史研究中特有的概念,還是指歷史研究中各個(gè)具體領(lǐng)域適用的研究方法,人們對(duì)此意見不一!
特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;
②部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請(qǐng)聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。
近些年來,攻讀在職研究生已經(jīng)成為很多人提高自我的重要方法,我們都知道,非全日制研究生與全日制研究生一同考試,入學(xué)較難,因而同等學(xué)力申碩已經(jīng)成為多數(shù)人的挑眩那么,...
評(píng)論0
“無需登錄,可直接評(píng)論...”