政策解讀
快速擇校
It is said that the public and Congressional concern about deceptive (欺騙性的) packaging rumpus (喧囂) started because Senator Hart discovered that the boxes of cereals consumed by him, Mrs. Hart, and their children were becoming higher and narrower, with a decline of net weight from 12 to 10-1/2 ounces, without any reduction in price. There were still twelve biscuits, but they had been reduced in size. Later, the Senator rightly complained of a store- bought pie in a handsomely illustrated box that pictured, in a single slice, almost as many cherries as there were in the whole pie. The manufacturer who increases the unit
price of his product by changing his package size to lower the quantity delivered can, without undue hardship, put his product into boxes, bags, and tins that will contain even 4-ounce, 8-ounce, one-pound, two-pound quantities of breakfast foods, cake mixes, etc. A study of drugstore (雜貨店) and supermarket shelves will convince any observer that all possible sizes and shapes of boxes, jars, bottles, and tins are in use at the same time, and, as the package journals show, week by week, there is never any hesitation in introducing a new size and shape of box or bottle when it aids in product differentiation. The producers of packaged products argue strongly against changing sizes of packages to contain even weights and volumes, but no one in the trade comments unfavorably on the huge costs incurred by endless changes of package sizes, materials, shape, art work, and net weights that are used for improving a product's market position.
When a packaging expert explained that he was able to multiply the price of hard sweets by 2.5, from $1 to $ 2.50 by changing to a fancy jar, or that he had made a 5-ounce bottle look as though it held 8 ounces, he was in effect telling the public that packaging can be a very expensive luxury. It evidently does come high, when an average family pays about $ 200 a year for bottles, cans, boxes, jars and other containers, most of which can't be used for anything but stuffing the garbage can.
1. What started the public and Congressional concern about deceptive packaging rumpus?
A. Consumers' complaints about the changes in package size.
B. Expensive packaging for poor quality products.
C. A senator's discovery of the tricks in packaging.
D. The rise in the unit price for many products.
2. The word "undue" (Line 2, Para. 2) means " ".
A. improper
C. unexpected
B. adequate
D. excessive
3. Consumers are concerned about the changes in package size, mainly because .
A. they hate to see any changes in things they are familiar with
B. the unit price for a product often rises as a result
C. they have to pay for the cost of changing package sizes
D. this entails an increase in the cost of packaging
4. According to this passage, various types of packaging come into existence to .
A. meet the needs of consumers
C. enhance the market position of products
B. suit all kinds of products
D. introduce new products
5. The author is critical mainly of .
A. dishonest packaging
B. inferior packaging
C. the changes in package size
D. exaggerated illustrations on packages
參考答案:CDBCA
聯(lián)考須知:2011在職聯(lián)考科目 考試時間 ♦考場守則及違規(guī)處理 ♦資格審查 ♦錄取工作
復習指導:在職聯(lián)考備考專題 ♦在職聯(lián)考歷年真題 ♦如何利用真題 ♦ 如何更有效備考
考試大綱:聯(lián)考英語大綱解析 ♦會計綜合大綱 ♦ GCT數(shù)學大綱 ♦法碩考試大綱 ♦更多
特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責任;
②部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡,如有侵權(quán),請聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。
工學在職研究生考英語二嗎?工學在職研究生英語考試科目分三類。學術(shù)型工學碩士及部分專業(yè)型碩士必考英語一,難度高,側(cè)重學術(shù)英語。工程管理等7類管理類專業(yè)碩士必考英語...
國際政治在職研究生就業(yè)方向國際政治在職研究生就業(yè)方向呈現(xiàn)“寬口徑、高適配”特點,既涵蓋傳統(tǒng)領域,也延伸至新興賽道:體制內(nèi)
電氣工程在職研究生歷年國家線(工學門類):2025年A區(qū)總分260分(單科34/51)、B區(qū)250分(31/47)。該專業(yè)就業(yè)廣(電力、工控等),報考分統(tǒng)考(非...
武漢在職研究生報考學校多樣,涵蓋中南財經(jīng)政法大學、武漢理工大學、湖北美術(shù)學院等。按專業(yè)分,藝術(shù)可選湖北美術(shù)學院(藝術(shù)學、設計學,1.6萬/2年);工學選武漢工程...
國際法學在職研究生介紹國際法學在職研究生,主要培養(yǎng)具有扎實國際法學理論基礎,熟悉國際法律事務運作,能在政府部門、企事業(yè)單
法學在職研究生都有哪些院?蛇x?有中國政法大學、華東政法大學等院?裳T诜蓪崉疹I域,其學位是專業(yè)能力佐證,在中小型律所等優(yōu)勢明顯;體制內(nèi)單位中,與全日制學位效...
評論0
“無需登錄,可直接評論...”